This study was performed to evaluate horizontal and vertical characteristics according to lateral cephalometry of adult Korean skeletal Class II patients using a selected horizontal and vertical reference planes of Koreans.
60 males and 60 females consisting of freshman of Yonsei University from 1996 to 1997 and patients with history of orthognatic surgery at the Dental Hospital of Yonsei University with a skeletal Class 11 profile were chosen and compared with 70 males and 70 females with normal occlusion. The skeletal Class II group had the following conditions : 1. Profile composed of a retrognathic mandible or protrusive maxilla; 2. Class II molar and canine key; 3. ANB-greater than 4°; 4. Wits appraisal-greater than i.Omm;
Cephalometric analysis consisted of 22 skeletal, 25 soft tissue, 12 dental measurements.
The results were as follows.
1. There was no considerable vertical measurement difference between the skeletal Class II malocclusion group and the normal occlusion group in skeletal analysis. But, some variations were found between the two groups in soft tiss ie analysis.
2..Mahdibular?length of the skeletal Class II malocclusion group was smaller than that of the normal occlusion group.
Mandible was ´more posteriorly positioned in the Class II malocclusion group than in the normal occlusion group.
3. The length and antero-posterior position of the maxilla were not different between the Class II malocclusion and the
normal occlusion group.
4. The antero-posterior position of the nose, upper lip and maxillary soft tissue, and nasolabial angle were not different between the two groups.
5. Mandibular soft tissue of the Class II malocclusion group was more posteriorly positioned than that of the normal. 6. The vertical measurements of the incisors(Ul-HP, Ll-MP) were bigger in the Class II malocclusion group than in the
normal, but those of the molars(U6-HP, L6-MP) showed no significant difference between the two groups.
7. Classifying the skeletal Class II malocclusion group according to the antero-posterior position of both jaws, normally
positioned maxilla and retruded mandible was 43.3%, both normally positioned maxilla and mandible 28.3%, both
retruded maxilla and mandible 20.Q%..
|